wolven – All 49

News

1ste wolf geschoten in Oostenrijk

In Oberösterreich (Opper-Oostenrijk), een deelstaat van Oostenrijk met als hoofdstad Linz, is in de nacht van dinsdag op woensdag de eerste wolf geschoten, en dit sinds de nieuwe verordening inzake wolvenbeheer op 1 juli van kracht werd. Opper-Oostenrijk, amper 900km verwijderd van België, grenst aan Duitsland en Tsjechië, wat er meteen voor zorgt dat “wolvenbeheer” geen ver-van-mijn-bedshow meer is.
Ging het om een probleemwolf?
De wolf – om precies te zijn een vrouwtjeswolf – was al drie keer weggejaagd omdat ze haar natuurlijke schuwheid verloren had en mensen te dicht benaderde. Daarom was er sprake van een probleemwolf die volgens de nieuwe regelgeving vanaf 30 oktober kon geschoten worden. Een DNA-analyse moet nog uitwijzen of de wolvin ook verantwoordelijk was voor eventuele aanvallen op vee uit de buurt.
“De veiligheid van de mensen en het voortbestaan van onze familieboerderijen worden in onze provincie gewaarborgd“, benadrukte Michaela Langer-Weninger, lid van de Provinciale Landbouwraad, woensdag tegenover het Oostenrijks persagentschap APA. Van de geschoten wolvin zullen DNA-stalen onderzocht worden, evenals haar maaginhoud, door de Universiteit voor Diergeneeskunde in Wenen.
Het is onwaarschijnlijk dat het om een gevestigde wolf gaat uit de buurt – waarvan reeds DNA-stalen zijn genomen – maar eerder om een jongere, zwervende wolvin, zo vernam het Oostenrijks persagentschap.
Om de lokale jagers te beschermen tegen vijandige reacties van anti-jagers, blijven de locatie en de identiteit van de schutter geheim. Jagers uit 20 verschillende jachtgebieden kregen toestemming om op de “probleemwolf” te jagen omdat hun jachtgebieden binnen de voorgeschreven perimeter van tien kilometer lag.
Wat is de visie van HVV?
De komst van de wolf is een feit en is een uitbreiding van de Vlaamse fauna, doch is Vlaanderen geen geschikt leefgebied voor wolven, mede door het vele verkeer, de versnippering en o.a. de verspreide bebouwing.
De wolf heeft als toppredator een mogelijke impact op het populatieniveau en/of op het gedrag van prooisoorten. Dit is voornamelijk het geval bij vestiging en veel minder bij occasioneel doortrekkende wolven. We willen vanuit Hubertus Vereniging Vlaanderen ook benadrukken dat het in Vlaanderen, mede door de hoge grofwildstand, erg onwaarschijnlijk is dat de wolf grofwildpopulaties dermate kan reguleren waardoor afschot overbodig zou worden. De everzwijnenproblematiek in Limburg, waar een wolvenroedel leeft, heeft dit genoegzaam aangetoond.
Indien toch blijkt dat de komst van wolven in Vlaanderen op termijn leidt tot grotere en meer mobiele rotten everzwijnen, en dus aanleiding geeft tot ernstige directe en indirecte schade, is ook hier een heroverweging noodzakelijk van de rol van de wolf in intensief gebruikte cultuurlandschappen. Toch verwachten we echter dat de wolven zelf zullen uitmaken of er in Vlaanderen geschikt leefgebied te vinden is.

1ste wolf geschoten in Oostenrijk In Oberösterreich (Opper-Oostenrijk), een deelstaat van Oostenrijk met als hoofdstad Linz, is in de nacht van dinsdag op woensdag de eerste wolf geschoten, en dit sinds de nieuwe verordening inzake wolvenbeheer op 1 juli van kracht werd. Opper-Oostenrijk, amper 900km verwijderd van België, grenst aan Duitsland en Tsjechië, wat er meteen voor zorgt dat “wolvenbeheer” geen ver-van-mijn-bedshow meer is. Ging het om een probleemwolf? De wolf – om precies te zijn een vrouwtjeswolf – was al drie keer weggejaagd omdat ze haar natuurlijke schuwheid verloren had en mensen te dicht benaderde. Daarom was er sprake van een probleemwolf die volgens de nieuwe regelgeving vanaf 30 oktober kon geschoten worden. Een DNA-analyse moet nog uitwijzen of de wolvin ook verantwoordelijk was voor eventuele aanvallen op vee uit de buurt. “De veiligheid van de mensen en het voortbestaan van onze familieboerderijen worden in onze provincie gewaarborgd“, benadrukte Michaela Langer-Weninger, lid van de Provinciale Landbouwraad, woensdag tegenover het Oostenrijks persagentschap APA. Van de geschoten wolvin zullen DNA-stalen onderzocht worden, evenals haar maaginhoud, door de Universiteit voor Diergeneeskunde in Wenen. Het is onwaarschijnlijk dat het om een gevestigde wolf gaat uit de buurt – waarvan reeds DNA-stalen zijn genomen – maar eerder om een jongere, zwervende wolvin, zo vernam het Oostenrijks persagentschap. Om de lokale jagers te beschermen tegen vijandige reacties van anti-jagers, blijven de locatie en de identiteit van de schutter geheim. Jagers uit 20 verschillende jachtgebieden kregen toestemming om op de “probleemwolf” te jagen omdat hun jachtgebieden binnen de voorgeschreven perimeter van tien kilometer lag. Wat is de visie van HVV? De komst van de wolf is een feit en is een uitbreiding van de Vlaamse fauna, doch is Vlaanderen geen geschikt leefgebied voor wolven, mede door het vele verkeer, de versnippering en o.a. de verspreide bebouwing. De wolf heeft als toppredator een mogelijke impact op het populatieniveau en/of op het gedrag van prooisoorten. Dit is voornamelijk het geval bij vestiging en veel minder bij occasioneel doortrekkende wolven. We willen vanuit Hubertus Vereniging Vlaanderen ook benadrukken dat het in Vlaanderen, mede door de hoge grofwildstand, erg onwaarschijnlijk is dat de wolf grofwildpopulaties dermate kan reguleren waardoor afschot overbodig zou worden. De everzwijnenproblematiek in Limburg, waar een wolvenroedel leeft, heeft dit genoegzaam aangetoond. Indien toch blijkt dat de komst van wolven in Vlaanderen op termijn leidt tot grotere en meer mobiele rotten everzwijnen, en dus aanleiding geeft tot ernstige directe en indirecte schade, is ook hier een heroverweging noodzakelijk van de rol van de wolf in intensief gebruikte cultuurlandschappen. Toch verwachten we echter dat de wolven zelf zullen uitmaken of er in Vlaanderen geschikt leefgebied te vinden is.

Post: 21 November 2023

Dmitri Shi

Pack of Canadian Wolves Released in National Park to Control Moose Populations
It rippled through the conservation and hunting communities this week when news broke that four Canadian wolves were air-dropped in a national park.

According to a recent National Park Service (NPS) news release, the wolves were trapped in Canada and released in the Isle Royale National Park in Michigan.

“During a narrow weather window between storms last week, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (OMNRF) successfully transferred four wolves to Isle Royale National Park,” NPS said. “Earlier this winter, severe weather on both sides of the border hampered the ability to capture and transfer wolves. However, NPS staff worked diligently with ONMRF and over the course of four days successfully translocated Canadian wolves. Two mainland wolves, one female and one male from the same pack and both with a black coat color variation, were captured on crown land near Wawa, Ontario, and transferred to Isle Royale. Weather cleared long enough on Thursday to provide an opportunity to access Michipicoten Island Provincial Park, where two males were captured.”

Mark Romanski was pleased with the transfer.

“I am impressed by the resilience this international team showed to overcome adversity and meet project objectives: polar vortex, federal government shutdown, complex aviation logistics, the list is endless,” stated Mark Romanski, Division Chief of Natural Resources for Isle Royale National Park and project manager for the reintroduction efforts. He continued, “I am even more blown away by the resilience of these wolves who within hours after undergoing capture and handling and arriving on Isle Royale, immediately got on the trail of their pack mates. These large males, all around 90 pounds, will almost certainly know what to do when they encounter a moose.”

Many among the hunting community are outraged at the release of these wolves. And those same hunter-conservationists were quick to admit that they, if given the chance to help manage the population, would also know what to do when they saw a moose.

That didn’t stop the NPS from making the decision that it did, though. Some say that it seems wolf predation is a preferred population management tool by NPS.

“NPS made the decision to restore predation, a key ecosystem dynamic, to Isle Royale National Park last June and sourcing the startup population from diverse geographic areas was essential to ensure genetic diversity,” NPS said. “Canadian wolves have been a critical component to future success and graciously Ontario Premier Doug Ford approved the operation in October to support NPS objectives. Understanding the goal of balancing the male/female wolf ratio on Isle Royale combined with a need for robust wolf genetics from Canada, OMNRF personnel remained committed to providing wolves from Ontario to support the repopulation of Isle Royale. Knowing weather could prevent access to Michipicoten Island, OMNRF worked with NPS to develop a strategy to acquire wolves from the mainland in Ontario if they were unable to access the island.”

Superintendent of Isle Royale National Park Phyllis Green applauded the release.

“To see these wolves disappear into the forests of Isle Royale and to have an opportunity to start a new generation of wolves on the island fulfilled a major objective in the first year of reestablishing the population,” Green said. “The success reflected six months of planning and represented a major accomplishment by the agencies involved.” Changing ice conditions and winter storms foiled a previous attempt to acquire the Canadian wolves. This week afforded only four operating days between weather windows and the success of the operations can be attributed to the planning and expertise of the OMNRF. Green cited the amazing aircraft resources of the OMNRF, normally used for firefighting, which were critical in capturing the wolves and delivering them to Isle Royale National Park.”

Again, a quick scroll through social media quickly revealed that a vast portion of the hunting community didn’t agree with the decision to release more wolves in the Lower 48. Many would have rather seen hunters given a chance to help manage moose populations instead of introducing more wolves into the mix.

Their arguments, while seemingly falling on deaf ears, had valid points:

Allowing hunters to achieve NPS goals would produce license and tags sales that would benefit conservation.
Opting for hunters, instead of wolves, to achieve population management goals would generate revenue, instead of costing the government time, money and resources to trap, import and release wolves.
Hunting would be a more accurate method for pin-point population management, as the number of moose taken could be regulated via quotas.
If hunters managed the moose population, rather than wolves, other species would not be affected — some of which are already in trouble. As wolves will not only take moose but also deer and other game animals, too.
Now that more wolves are on the landscape, and their numbers will likely grow, public safety concerns continue to rise as predator populations increase.
It’s clear that, while many are not happy with the recent release of four Canadian Wolves in the UP of Michigan, that seems to be the future of wildlife management within the National Park Service.

Pack of Canadian Wolves Released in National Park to Control Moose Populations It rippled through the conservation and hunting communities this week when news broke that four Canadian wolves were air-dropped in a national park. According to a recent National Park Service (NPS) news release, the wolves were trapped in Canada and released in the Isle Royale National Park in Michigan. “During a narrow weather window between storms last week, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (OMNRF) successfully transferred four wolves to Isle Royale National Park,” NPS said. “Earlier this winter, severe weather on both sides of the border hampered the ability to capture and transfer wolves. However, NPS staff worked diligently with ONMRF and over the course of four days successfully translocated Canadian wolves. Two mainland wolves, one female and one male from the same pack and both with a black coat color variation, were captured on crown land near Wawa, Ontario, and transferred to Isle Royale. Weather cleared long enough on Thursday to provide an opportunity to access Michipicoten Island Provincial Park, where two males were captured.” Mark Romanski was pleased with the transfer. “I am impressed by the resilience this international team showed to overcome adversity and meet project objectives: polar vortex, federal government shutdown, complex aviation logistics, the list is endless,” stated Mark Romanski, Division Chief of Natural Resources for Isle Royale National Park and project manager for the reintroduction efforts. He continued, “I am even more blown away by the resilience of these wolves who within hours after undergoing capture and handling and arriving on Isle Royale, immediately got on the trail of their pack mates. These large males, all around 90 pounds, will almost certainly know what to do when they encounter a moose.” Many among the hunting community are outraged at the release of these wolves. And those same hunter-conservationists were quick to admit that they, if given the chance to help manage the population, would also know what to do when they saw a moose. That didn’t stop the NPS from making the decision that it did, though. Some say that it seems wolf predation is a preferred population management tool by NPS. “NPS made the decision to restore predation, a key ecosystem dynamic, to Isle Royale National Park last June and sourcing the startup population from diverse geographic areas was essential to ensure genetic diversity,” NPS said. “Canadian wolves have been a critical component to future success and graciously Ontario Premier Doug Ford approved the operation in October to support NPS objectives. Understanding the goal of balancing the male/female wolf ratio on Isle Royale combined with a need for robust wolf genetics from Canada, OMNRF personnel remained committed to providing wolves from Ontario to support the repopulation of Isle Royale. Knowing weather could prevent access to Michipicoten Island, OMNRF worked with NPS to develop a strategy to acquire wolves from the mainland in Ontario if they were unable to access the island.” Superintendent of Isle Royale National Park Phyllis Green applauded the release. “To see these wolves disappear into the forests of Isle Royale and to have an opportunity to start a new generation of wolves on the island fulfilled a major objective in the first year of reestablishing the population,” Green said. “The success reflected six months of planning and represented a major accomplishment by the agencies involved.” Changing ice conditions and winter storms foiled a previous attempt to acquire the Canadian wolves. This week afforded only four operating days between weather windows and the success of the operations can be attributed to the planning and expertise of the OMNRF. Green cited the amazing aircraft resources of the OMNRF, normally used for firefighting, which were critical in capturing the wolves and delivering them to Isle Royale National Park.” Again, a quick scroll through social media quickly revealed that a vast portion of the hunting community didn’t agree with the decision to release more wolves in the Lower 48. Many would have rather seen hunters given a chance to help manage moose populations instead of introducing more wolves into the mix. Their arguments, while seemingly falling on deaf ears, had valid points: Allowing hunters to achieve NPS goals would produce license and tags sales that would benefit conservation. Opting for hunters, instead of wolves, to achieve population management goals would generate revenue, instead of costing the government time, money and resources to trap, import and release wolves. Hunting would be a more accurate method for pin-point population management, as the number of moose taken could be regulated via quotas. If hunters managed the moose population, rather than wolves, other species would not be affected — some of which are already in trouble. As wolves will not only take moose but also deer and other game animals, too. Now that more wolves are on the landscape, and their numbers will likely grow, public safety concerns continue to rise as predator populations increase. It’s clear that, while many are not happy with the recent release of four Canadian Wolves in the UP of Michigan, that seems to be the future of wildlife management within the National Park Service.

Post: 11 July 2022

Ksenia B

Wolf hunting is the practice of hunting wolves. Wolves are mainly hunted for sport, for their skins, to protect livestock and, in some rare cases, to protect humans. Wolves have been actively hunted since 8,000 to 10,000 years ago, when they first began to pose a threat to livestock of Neolithic human communities. Historically, the hunting of wolves was a huge capital- and manpower-intensive operation. The threat wolves posed to both livestock and people was considered significant enough to warrant the conscription of whole villages under threat of punishment, despite the disruption of economic activities and reduced taxes. The hunting of gray wolves, while originally actively endorsed in many countries, has become a controversial issue across the globe. Most people see it as cruel, unnecessary and based on misconceptions, while proponents argue that it is apparently vital for the conservation of game herds and as pest control.

Wolf hunting is the practice of hunting wolves. Wolves are mainly hunted for sport, for their skins, to protect livestock and, in some rare cases, to protect humans. Wolves have been actively hunted since 8,000 to 10,000 years ago, when they first began to pose a threat to livestock of Neolithic human communities. Historically, the hunting of wolves was a huge capital- and manpower-intensive operation. The threat wolves posed to both livestock and people was considered significant enough to warrant the conscription of whole villages under threat of punishment, despite the disruption of economic activities and reduced taxes. The hunting of gray wolves, while originally actively endorsed in many countries, has become a controversial issue across the globe. Most people see it as cruel, unnecessary and based on misconceptions, while proponents argue that it is apparently vital for the conservation of game herds and as pest control.

Post: 28 June 2023

Arsenii Kravzhul

Filter


Sort by

Country

City